SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 622

ARUN BHANSALI
Kaluram – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Shreyansh Mardia, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against the judgment & decree dated 19.01.2021 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pindwara, District Sirohi, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment & decree dated 08.02.2018 passed by the Civil Judge, Pindwara, District Sirohi has been rejected and the decree for permanent and mandatory injunction passed by the trial court has been upheld.

2. The suit was filed by Dinesh Kumar against the appellant- defendant, inter-alia, with the averments that the plaintiff's house was situated at Village Jhadoli, the boundaries of the house were indicated in the plaint. It was averred that the plaintiff has purchased the land from Jaisa Ram S/o Galbaji by a registered sale deed dated 06.04.1993. It was claimed that the only way for coming on the said plot was from the public lane situated on Western side of the plot.

3. Alongwith the suit, a map was produced, wherein the disputed public way was indicated as B.P.G.H. and the width of the lane was indicated as 13ft. It was claimed that the lane was in existence for long time and is being used by him as and when required. The defendant, without any right, ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top