SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 640

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Dayaram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dinesh Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.79/2021, Police Station Udai Moad, Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offences are triable by the Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and the trial will take long time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that three other cases are registered against the accused-petitioner.

5. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances, particularly to the fact that offences are triable by the Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and that trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top