IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Inderjeet Singh, J.
Rajasthan Shiksha Karmi Board - Appellant
Versus
Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4615/2021
Decided on : 09-07-2021
Employees Provident Fund - Recovery of Damages - Interpretation of Sections 14-B and 7-Q of the Act of 1952
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a stay on the recovery of 50 percent damages under Section 14-B of the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, citing a previous decision by the Coordinate Bench of the Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court issued a notice to the respondents and scheduled the matter for further hearing, while granting a stay on the recovery of damages and interest provided the petitioner deposited the specified amounts within a given timeframe.
Issues: Interpretation of Sections 14-B and 7-Q of the Act of 1952, Stay on Recovery of Damages and Interest
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the interpretation of the provisions of Sections 14-B and 7-Q of the Act of 1952 and granted a stay on the recovery of damages and interest based on the petitioner's compliance with the specified deposit requirements.
Final Decision: The Court granted a stay on the recovery of damages and interest, subject to the petitioner's compliance with the deposit conditions.
JUDGMENT
1. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition has been considered by the Coordinate Bench of this court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8052/2020 in the matter of Rajasthan Shiksha Karmi Board v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner where in on 31.07.2020, the following order was passed:-
Learned counsel submitted that in the present case, as far as the main contribution under Section 7-A of the Act of 1952 is concerned, the petitioner Board has already deposited the same, however, the amount of interest under Section 7-Q of the Act of 1952 and damages under Section 14-B of the Act of 1952 has not been so far deposited.
Learned counsel submits that at least, interim order may be passed to the extent of staying the recovery of 50 percent of damages, as per law laid down by this Court.
Issue notice of the writ petition as well as stay application, returnable on 26th August, 2020.
Additionally, copy of the writ petition be served in the office of learned counsel Mr.RB Mathur, who appeared in other similar matters.
In the meanwhile, the effect and operation of the order dated 20th September, 2014, shall remain stayed provided the petitioner Board deposits 50 percent of damages and full amount of interest, as per Section 7-Q of the Act of 1952 within a period of four weeks.
This Court makes it clear that as far as the interest, which is determined under Section 7-Q of the Act of 1952 is concerned, it will be required to be deposited by the petitioner Board within a period of four weeks.
The operation of the order of the Rajasthan Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal dated 8th November, 2019 shall also remain stayed subject to the conditions prescribed by this Court of depositing the aforesaid amount."
2. In that view of the matter, issue notice to the respondents.
3. List this matter alongwith S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8052/2020 on 31.08.2021.
4. Meanwhile, operation of the order dated 05/08-04-2016 (Annexure-4), 10.05.2016 (Annexure-5) and 24.12.2020 (Annexure-6) shall remain stayed provided the petitioner deposits 50 % of the damages and full amount of the interest as per Section 7-Q of the Act of 1952 within a period of six weeks.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.