IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma,Mahendar Kumar Goyal, JJ.
Nilam Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1020 of 2021
Decided on : 22-06-2021
Parole - Amendment of Rules - Rule 10B, Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Rule 10B, Rule 9, Rule 10, Rule 12, Rule 10A, Rule 14 - The court examined the statutory scheme for grant of parole/emergent parole under the Rules of 1958 and found that the parameters for grant of parole and emergent parole are distinct and operate in their independent arena. The court also discussed the provisions of Rule 10B, Rule 9, Rule 10A, and Rule 14, and highlighted the different conditions and criteria for grant of regular parole and emergent parole. The court emphasized that emergent parole is not qualified by the conditions required for regular parole and that the two operate based on sound logical reasoning. The court also addressed the petitioner's contention of discrimination under Rule 10B and concluded that the contention had no merit. The court dismissed the criminal writ petition (parole) as being devoid of merit.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was convicted and sentenced for various offences and sought extension of emergent parole. The State Government had inserted Rule 10B in the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958, and subsequently amended it. The petitioner claimed that the provisions of Rule 10B were discriminatory as they did not extend the benefit of special parole/extension of parole to prisoners on emergent parole.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the parameters for grant of parole and emergent parole are distinct and operate in their independent arena. It concluded that emergent parole is not qualified by the conditions required for regular parole and that the two operate based on sound logical reasoning. The court also addressed the petitioner's contention of discrimination under Rule 10B and concluded that the contention had no merit.
Issues: The issues involved in the case included the petitioner's claim of discrimination under Rule 10B and the jurisdiction of the court to issue directions for amending the Rule.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the distinct parameters for grant of parole and emergent parole, the lack of merit in the petitioner's claim of discrimination under Rule 10B, and the limited jurisdiction of the court to issue directions for amending the Rule.
Final Decision: The criminal writ petition (parole) was dismissed as being devoid of merit.
JUDGMENT
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) has been filed with the following prayers:
(ii) to direct the respondents to release and allow the petitioner Nilam Kumar S/o Shri Ramjilal on special parole till 30th June, 2021 upon like conditions as enumerated in the order dated 17.5.2021 (Annexure-10) while allowing other prisoners on special parole till 30th June, 2021;
(iii) to call for the record pertains to the present matter;
(iv) to pass any other order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the present facts and circumstances, in favour of the petitioner."
2. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner was convicted and sentenced by the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST (PA) Cases, Jhalawar in Sessions Case No.38/2018 vide judgement dated 13.07.2020 for the offences under Sections 302, 302/34, 307, 307/34 of IPC, Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (PA) Act, 1989 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. The petitioner is undergoing sentence in Central Jail, Udaipur and has served more than six years of imprisonment without remission.
3. Vide order dated 25.5.2021, the District Magistrate, Jhalawar granted the petitioner emergent parole for a period of 15 days under Rule 10A of the Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958 on account of his father suffering from Covid-19. Vide application dated 4.6.2021, the petitioner applied for extension of emergent parole before the Inspector General of Prisons, Rajasthan and District Magistrate, Jhalawar; but, with no response. The State Government vide Notification dated 10.4.2020 inserted Rule 10B in the Rules of 1958 which reads as under:
Provided that special parole under this rule shall not be granted to the prisoner who has been convicted for the offence related to Acid Attack, Rape, Dacoity, Murder, section 4 or 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Economic Offences, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Anti National Activities, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 or any other offence of similar nature or the cases investigated by any central investigating Agencies.
(2) The prisoners who are already availing first, second or third parole or the parole of 40 days granted every year, as the case may be, on the date of commencement of these rules i.e. the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole (Amendment) Rules, 2020, the period of such parole shall be deemed to be extended upto 03rd May 2020."
4. The State Government vide Notification dated 17.5.2021 amended Rule 10B of the Rules of 1958 which reads as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.