SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Ramphul - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Temporary Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 375 of 2021
Decided on : 28-06-2021

Advocates appeared:
Ramniwas Bishnoi, Advocate, M.R. Pareek, Advocate

The court has the discretion to grant temporary suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC, considering humanitarian grounds and previous grants of interim bail in similar circumstances.

Headnote:

Section 389 CrPC - Temporary Suspension of Sentence - The court allowed the temporary suspension of sentence for a period of 10 days to enable the appellant to perform the remaining customary rituals pursuant to the death of his mother, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, convicted and sentenced for offences under the NDPS Act, applied for temporary suspension of sentence due to the death of his mother, seeking 10 days of interim bail to perform rituals.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the temporary suspension of sentence for 10 days, considering the humanitarian aspect of the matter and the fact that the appellant had previously been granted interim bail in similar circumstances.

Issues: Application for temporary suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC due to the death of the appellant's mother.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the humanitarian aspect of the matter and the previous grant of interim bail to the appellant in similar circumstances.

Final Decision: The court allowed the temporary suspension of sentence for a period of 10 days, subject to specific conditions, to enable the appellant to perform rituals, with the requirement to surrender after the specified period.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - The instant application for temporary suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant-applicant Ramphul S/o Nathu Lal, who has been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 8/18 (Kha) read with Section 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act vide the judgment dated 18.11.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No.36/2018, on the ground that his mother Smt. Fula Bai has passed away on 17.04.2021.

2. The factum regarding the death of Smt. Fula Bai W/o Nathu Lal is sought to be established through a death certificate placed on record. This court is informed that the appellant was previously granted interim bail vide order dated 13.01.2020 on the ground that his father had expired.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the appellant returned back to jail immediately on completion of the period of interim bail. Thus, he submits that the appellant may be granted interim bail for a period of 10 days so as to enable him to perform the remaining customary rituals pursuant to the death of his mother.

4. Learned Special Public Prosecutor through formally opposed the application, but he too is not in a position to dispute the fact that as per the death certificate placed on record, the appellant's mother has passed away on 17.04.2021. It is admitted that the appellant was previously granted temporary bail vide order dated 13.01.2020 in almost similar circumstances when his father expired.

5. In this background and taking a humanitarian view of the matter, the application for temporary suspension of sentence is allowed. The sentence awarded to appellant-applicant Ramphul S/o Nathu Lal by learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No.36/2018 vide judgment dated 18.11.2019 shall remain suspended for a period of 10 days from the date of his actual release subject to the condition that he deposits a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as security with the trial court and furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court. The applicant appellant shall surrender before the Superintendent Central Jail, Bikaner in the morning of the next day of completion of the period of temporary bail. If the appellant-applicant does not surrender on the given date, then the trial court shall forfeit the amount of security deposited by the appellant and shall issue arrest warrant against him immediately.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top