SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 718

PANKAJ BHANDARI
Rashika Khandal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Subhash Sharma, for the Appellant; Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Petitioners have preferred this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking protection of life and liberty.

2. From perusal of the record, it is revealed that Petitioner No.2 is already married. A live-in-relationship between a married and unmarried person is not permissible.

3. The pre-requities for a live-in-relationship as held by the Apex Court in "D.Velusamy vs. D. Patchaiammal (2010) 10 SCC 469" is that the couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses and must be of legal age to marry or qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried.

4. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly dismissed.

5. Stay application stands disposed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top