SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 730

ARUN BHANSALI
Narendra Kumar Godara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rakesh Matoria, for the Appellant; Mr. S.K. Bhati, P.P, Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner (juvenile- through his natural guardian father Father Krishan Lal Jat S/o Shri Devi Lal Jat) as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is of offences under Sections 302, 341, 323, 109, 147, 148 and 149 IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 3(2)(V) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Act of 2015 before learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sriganganagar was rejected vide order dated 18.12.2020. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal was filed by the petitioner before the Session Court, Sriganganagar and the same has been dismissed vide impugned order dated 7.1.2021.

3. Being aggrieved of the orders dated 18.12.2020 and 7.1.2021 passed by the learned courts below, the petitioner has preferred this revision petition before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Challan of the case has already been presented in this case. Petitioner is below 18 years of age and there is no evidence to show that if the juvenile-petitioner is released on bail, then his release is likely to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top