IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Arun Bhansali, J.
Jagram Vishnoi - Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6094/2021
Decided on : 19-04-2021
No Confidence Motion - Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Anaj), Jodhpur - The court issued directions to ensure free and fair conducting of the meeting for 'No Confidence Motion', including extending the time for discussion/meeting, holding voting by secret ballots, ensuring videography of the meeting and voting, and counting the ballots with the result to be produced before the Court in a sealed envelope.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition to challenge the notice and corrigendum issued in relation to the No Confidence Motion moved against the petitioner as Chairman of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Anaj), Jodhpur. The court issued directions to ensure free and fair conducting of the meeting for 'No Confidence Motion'. The proceedings for consideration of No Confidence Motion were held, and the result was reported by the authorized officer.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the votes in favor of the no confidence motion were less than the required 2/3rd of the members of the market committee present and voting, as per the provisions of Section 7(11)(b) of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961. Consequently, the petitioner did not want to press the petition any further, and the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
Issues: Challenge to the notice and corrigendum in relation to the No Confidence Motion, compliance with the provisions of Section 7(11)(b) of the Act, and the result of the No Confidence Motion.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of Section 7(11)(b) of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, which required the motion against the Chairman to be carried by a majority of not less than 2/3rd of the members of the market committee present and voting and by not less than 50% of its total membership.
Final Decision: The court made the order dated 08.04.2021 absolute, and the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to challenge the notice dated 30.03.2021 (Annex.3) as well as corrigendum dated 31.03.2021 (Annex.4) issued by the authorized officer in relation to the No Confidence Motion moved against the petitioner as Chairman of the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Anaj), Jodhpur.
2. When the writ petition came up before the Court on 08.04.2021 a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court ordered as under:-
Contention rather apprehension has been expressed about the free and fair atmosphere in the ensuing meeting.
Though host of other arguments were advanced, however, having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, particularly because 'No Confidence Motion' is scheduled to be held tomorrow, without entering into the issues canvassed at this stage, in a bid to ensure free and fair conducting of the meeting for 'No Confidence Motion' in question, the following directions are issued: -
(i) The time for discussion/meeting shall be 11.00 am to 12 Noon and thereafter voting shall take place,
(ii) The voting shall be held by secret ballots and not simply by raise of hands.
(iii) The Election Officer shall ensure videography of the meeting so also of the voting, obviously while maintaining secrecy of the ballots.
(iv) The Election Officer shall count the ballots and prepare the result, which shall not be declared. The same shall be produced before this Court in a sealed envelope on the next date of hearing, which is being fixed at 2.00 pm on 16.04.2021.
List the matter on 16.04.2021 at 2.00 pm."
3. Pursuant to the order dated 08.04.2021, the proceedings for consideration of No Confidence Motion were held on 09.04.2021.
4. When the matter came up before the Court on 16.04.2021, as ordered on 08.04.2021, though the authorized officer was present alongwith record, the matter was ordered to be listed on 19.04.2021.
5. Today again the authorized officer is present alongwith the record in a sealed cover.
6. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, the result of the No Confidence Motion was taken out from the sealed cover.
7. The authorized officer in his report dated 09.04.2021 pursuant to the voting held, in terms of the order passed by the Court on 08.04.2021, has reported as under:-
8. Further the authorized officer present in person, has referred to the provisions of Section 7(11)(b) of the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 ('the Act') regarding the requirement for passing of a No Confidence Motion.
9. Learned counsel for the petitioner also referred to the said provision and submitted that as the votes cast in favour of the no confidence motion are less than 2/3rd of the members of the market committee present, the motion has failed.
10. I have considered the submissions, as noticed, hereinbefore, out of the total existing 15 members, all attended the meeting and cast their vote, out of which, 9 cast their vote in favour of the No Confidence Motion and 6 against the No Confidence Motion.
11. Provisions of Section 7(11)(b) of the Act inter-alia read as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.