SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 745

SANDEEP MEHTA
Banwari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mridul Jain, Advocate, B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Mehta, J. - Per office report, notice of appeal has been served upon the complainant/respondent No.2. However, no one has appeared on her behalf despite service.

2. Rd. Perused the material available on record.

3. This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 being aggrieved of the order dated 16.01.2021 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Criminal Misc Bail Case No.22/2021 rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant who is in custody in connection with FIR No.127/2019, Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh, for offences under Section 148, 302/149, 341/149, 323/149, 326/149 IPC and under Section 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

4. Learned counsel Shri Jain urges that the material prosecution witnesses viz. Ajay @ Pawan Kumar (PW.1), Rahul (PW.2), Devendra (PW.3), Rajkumar (PW.4), Ramesh Kumar (PW.5) and Ravidass (PW.6) have been examined at the trial. None of them supported the prosecution case and were declared hostile. He also contended that one more inj

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top