SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 731

PRAKASH GUPTA
Rukmani – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Satish Khandal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prakash Gupta, J. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 7.9.2015 passed by the Board of Revenue, whereby the reference made by District Collector for cancellation of mutation entry in the revenue record, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the reference cannot be dismissed on the ground of delay because no time limit has been prescribed under Section 82 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act.

3. Heard. Considered.

4. Admittedly plaintiff Galya filed a suit for recovery of possession before Sub Divisional Officer, which was dismissed vide order dated 24.7.1967. Thereafter a reference was filed. The District Collector, Jaipur vide his order dated 25.1.2005 referred the matter to Board of Revenue for cancellation of the mutation entry. Original plaintiff Galya died and his legal representatives were brought on record. Thereafter, the Board of Revenue vide its judgment dated 7.9.2015 dismissed the reference.

5. It is relevant to mention here that Sajna (one of the legal representative of deceased Galya) had filed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15885/2015 before this Court challenging the order dated 7.9.2015

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top