SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 732

SANGEET LODHA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Narayan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Meena Narayan Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Trilok Joshi

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant assailing the legality of order dated 11.02.2020 passed by the Family Court, Rajsamand in Civil Case No. 168/19, whereby an application preferred by the respondent under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act of 1955') has been allowed and the appellant is directed to pay maintenance pendente lite to the respondent a sum of Rs. 4,000/- per month, litigation expenses Rs. 7,000/- in lump sum and Rs. 200/- for attending each date of hearing.

2. The respondent preferred a petition against the appellant seeking divorce under the provisions of Section 13 of the Act of 1955. During the pendency of the petition, the respondent filed an application under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, claiming maintenance pendente lite from the appellant, a sum of Rs. 12,000/- per month, Advocate Fee Rs. 15,000/- and Rs. 500/- towards travelling expenses to attend each date of hearing.

3. The respondent averred in the application that she has no source of income whereas the appellant is earning salary a sum of Rs. 25,000/- while working as Teacher in Tulsi Amrit School, Amet and Rs. 7 lacs from agriculture land ad measuring 32 bighas s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top