VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Harendra Jajda, S/o. Virma Ram Jat – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
1. All the above-mentioned bail applications shall stand decided by this common order as they arise out of same FIR.
2. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who are in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 557/2021, Police Station Kotwali, District Chittorgarh for the offences under Sections 363, 376(D), 376(2) (n) & 120-B of the I.P.C. and under Sections 3/4, 5M/6, 16/17 of POCSO Act cases 2012-(In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1577/2022), under Section 376-D of the I.P.C. and under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act - (In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 591/2022) & under Sections 363, 376(D), 376(2)(n) & 120-B of I.P.C. and under Sections 3/4, 5/6 & 16/17 of POCSO Act ( offences mentioned in F.I.R. under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, 2012 & 376-D of the I.P.C.) - (In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1078/2022).
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned senior counsel submits that as per the statement of Mst. 'R' recorded under Sections 161 & 164 Cr.P.C., the incident is reported to be of six months prior to the date of lodging the F.I.R.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.