SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Dulari Devi, W/o. Dilip Poddar – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Poddar, S/o. Ram Chandra Poddar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant misc. appeal has been preferred by the appellant Dulari Devi for assailing the order dated 19.2.2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Churu in Misc. Case No. 131/2018, whereby the application preferred by the appellant under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. was dismissed.
2. We have heard and considered the submissions advanced by the counsel representing the appellant and have gone through the impugned order.
3. The respondent filed an application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on 4.4.2018. Notice of the application was served on the appellant, who failed to appear despite service of notice, whereupon the learned Family Court proceeded to accept the application preferred by the respondent husband and passed an ex-parte decree dated 17.7.2018 directing dissolution of marriage of the appellant and the respondent. The appellant filed the application under Order 9 Rule 13 read with Section 151 C.P.C. alleging that as a matter of fact, the notice of the application was never served on her. She was made to sign the summon by keeping her in dark. The respondent fraudulently got her to sign an agreement dated 28.2.2018. The appellan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.