SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 77

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Devi W/o Late Kallaram – Appellant
Versus
Ramsen S/o Shanker Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ravi Panwar.
For the Respondents: Aditya Singhi, Vipul Solanki.

JUDGMENT :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Instant misc. appeal has been filed by the appellants-claimants against the judgment and award dated 07.12.2013 passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First), Jodhpur whereby the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim of the appellants-claimants and awarded a compensation of Rs. 9,93,000/- with interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.

2. While praying for enhancement, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the learned Tribunal has erred in considering the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 4,000/- per month. The appellants-claimants categorically stated that the deceased was working in the Iron Workshop and easily earned Rs. 30,000/- per month. Learned Tribunal has failed to consider the future rise in income while awarding the future loss of income. It is settled law that the future prospects of advancement in life and career should also be sounded in terms of money to augment the multiplicand. It is prayed that the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal may be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top