SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 118

MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL
Jahida Salma D/o Mohd. Shahid – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Himanshu Jain, Ram Pratap Saini, Aamir Khan, Girraj Rajoria, Tanveer Ahamad, Anil K. Sharma, Brahma Prakash, Naresh Kumar Bhardwaj, Naveen Dhuwan, Ankit Sethi, Shailender Singh Balwada, Sanjay Buri, Sanjay Mehla, Sunita Mehla, Nagendra Sharma, Satish Kumar Balwada, Vikram Singh, Deshraj Kalwania, Anil Kumar Sharma, Mahendra Sharma, Baboo Lal Dhakar, R.A. Verma, Vinod Kumar Sharma, Komal Kumari Giri, Vivek Choudhary, Amit Punia, Surendra Singh, Sunil Kumar Swami, Narendra Kumar Gajua, Arvind Kumar Berwal, Vinod Jhajharia, Karan Pal Singh, S.P. Singh, Ved Pal Shastri, Subhash Sharma, Arvind Kumar Arora, Sandeep Garssa, Mukesh Kumar, Mukesh Poonia, Sajid Ali, Ajay Choudhary, D.S. Dhariwal, Abhishek B. Sharma, Arun Singh Shekhawat, Akshat Kulshrestha, Akshat Choudhary, Amit Jindal, Shiv Lal Meena, Ashish Kumar Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Joshi, Rajveer Gurjar, Sukhdev Singh Solanki, Sanjay Khedar.
For the Respondents: V.B. Sharma, Prakhar Gupta, Vivek Tyagi, Naresh Kumar, Veerendra Singh, Neeraj Batra, Vinod Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chand Gupta.

JUDGMENT :

MAHENDRA KUMAR GOYAL, J.

1. Since, all these writ petitions share similar facts and involve common question of law, they have been heard together and are being disposed of vide this common order.

2. To understand the factual matrix, the facts from SB Civil Writ Petition No. 15111/2018 are being referred.

3. The petitioners applied for appointment on the post of Health Worker (Female) in pursuance of advertisement dated 18.06.2018. Their candidature was rejected on the premise that they have acquired qualification of ‘Adeeb’ from the Jamia Urdu, Aligarh which has not been recognized as equivalent to Secondary School examination by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Ajmer. A prayer has been made to consider the petitioners eligible for appointment and to accord them appointment as per their merit position with all consequential benefits.

4. The respondents No. 1 and 2 have, in their reply, stated that since the Adeeb examination passed from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh is not a valid equivalent qualification to secondary examination, the petitioners are not entitled for appointment.

5. The respondent No. 4 has, in its reply, stated that vide order dated 31.07.2002, it has grant

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top