SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 178

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Harmandeep Singh Barad S/o Sh. Angrez Singh and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State through PP and Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal Nos. 71 and 72 of 2022
Decided On : 05-02-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dhirendra Singh, Sr. Advocate assisted by Laxmi Rathore and Himmat Jagga, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mukesh Trivedi, PP.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 – Sections 302, 341, 323 & 34 - Criminal Procedure code,1973 – Section 439 - SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Sections 3(2)(v) 3(2)(va) – Accident - Stones hit deceased causing death - Learned counsel for appellant submits that there was exchange of pelting of stones between parties and one of those stones hit deceased causing his death - She further submits that there was no intention on part of appellant to cause fatal injuries as the incident occurred in heat of passion, on a trivial issue of some accident - She submits that co-accused has been enlarged on bail by learned trial court vide order and co-accused has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order – Held, instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR, Police Station for the offences under Sections 302, 341, 323 & 34 of I.P.C. and under Sections 3(2)(v) 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against order passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases whereby, bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of appellant was rejected - Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of arguments advanced, this Court is of opinion that appeal of appellant deserves to be allowed - Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.

1. Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the fact of the pendency of the present appeals has been informed to the respondent No. 2. The report to that effect has been filed before this Court and the same is taken on record. Thus, the service of notice upon respondent No. 2 is complete.

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 71/2022

3. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 117/2021, Police Station Sri Ganganagar Sadar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences under Sections 302, 341, 323 & 34 of I.P.C. and under Section 3(2)(v)(va of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 28.07.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

4. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there was exchange of pelting of stones between the parties and one of those stones hit the deceased Rajendra Singh causing his death. She further submits that there was no intention on the part of the appellant to cause fatal injuries as the incident occurred in the heat of passion, on a trivial issue of some accident. She submits that co-accused Vijay has been enlarged on bail by the learned trial court vide order dated 25.01.2022 and co-accused Babu Singh has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2022. She, therefore, prays that the appeal of the appellant may kindly be allowed.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the appeal.

7. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that appeal of the appellant deserves to be allowed.

8. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 28.07.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Harmandeep Singh Barad S/o. Sh. Angrez Singh arrested in connection with FIR No. 117/2021, Police Station Sri Ganganagar Sadar, District Sri Ganganagar shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 72/2022

9. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 117/2021, Police Station Sadar, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 302, 341, 323 & 34 of I.P.C. and under Sections 3(2)(v) 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 06.10.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sriganganagar, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

10. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

11. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there was exchange of pelting of stones between the parties and one of those stones hit the deceased Rajendra Singh causing his death. He further submits that there was no intention on the part of the appellant to cause fatal injuries as the incident occurred in the heat of passion, on a trivial issue of some accident. He submits that co-accused Vijay has been enlarged on bail by the learned trial court vide order dated 25.01.2022 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top