VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Chyanan @ Hanuman S/o Sh. Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
1. Lawyers are not appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
2. The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 364/2019, Police Station Sadulshahar, District Sriganganagar for the offence under Sections 8/21, 29 of NDPS Act.
3. Heard Mr. Mangi Lal Vishnoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the rejection of the first bail application on 16.06.2020, the statement of PW-2 Rakesh Swami has been recorded before the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no recovery of contraband drugs from the possession of the present petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as per the call details of the petitioner, he had spoken with the person from whom the contraband drugs was recovered only once and therefore, he is not connected with the recovery of contraband drugs in the present case.
5. Learned counsel for t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.