SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 208

SANDEEP MEHTA, SAMEER JAIN
Kishna Ram S/o Shri Sanval Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jai Kumar Kaushik.
For the Respondent: Pankaj Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel Shri J.K. Kaushik representing the petitioners and Shri Pankaj Sharma, learned AAG representing the respondents.

2. Before proceeding further, it is relevant to mention here that after the writ petition was filed, the petitioner No. 2 Rakesh Kumar Verma passed away and his legal representative Smt. Pratima Verma has been taken on record.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of this writ petition are noted herein-below:

    The petitioners Kishna Ram and Rakesh Kumar Verma were appointed as Junior Lab Assistants in the respondent Public Health and Engineering Department, Government of Rajasthan on 27.03.1993 and 06.11.1985 respectively. They were further promoted to the post of Senior Lab Assistant w.e.f. 14.06.2013 and 30.05.2003 respectively. As per the Rajasthan Services of Engineering Subordinate (Public Health Branch) Rules, 1967, the minimum educational qualification for the post of Jr. Lab Assistant is Intermediate in Science or equivalent academic qualification from a recognised institution preferably with experience of Laboratory work. 100% posts of Jr. Lab Assistants are meant to be filled in by direct recruitment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top