PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Rajaram – Appellant
Versus
Gopal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
1. In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
2. This writ petition has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
(ii) That the impugned order dated 25.03.2013 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Pilibanga, Annexure-5 be quashed and set aside; and
(iii) By an appropriate Order the record of the case be called for;
(iv) The application preferred by the Non-petitioner no. 1 be dismissed with costs throughout;
(v) In the alternative to above (iv), if the Hon'ble Court comes to a different conclusion, the impugned orders Annexures be set aside and the matter be remanded back with the direction to the Non-Petitioner no. 4 to decide the application afresh after affording opportunity to the parties and in accordance with law."
3. As the pleaded facts would reveal, the respondent No. 1 moved an application under Section 251-A of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1955') before the Assistant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.