ORDER :

Rekha Borana, J.

1. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner applied for the post of Junior Engineer in pursuance to the advertisement issued by the Department dated 02.04.2013. A corrigendum to the advertisement was issued on 30.04.2013 and in Clause No. 9 of the said corrigendum, the revised process for selection was mentioned. Clause No. 9 of the corrigendum advertisement dated 30.04.2013 is reproduced herein, which reads as under:

^^¼9½ la'kksf/kr p;u izfØ;k %& jkT; ljdkj }kjk funsZf'kr la'kksf/kr izfØ;k ds vuqlkj dfu"B vfHk;Urk ¼flfoy@eSdsfudy@bysfDVªd½ ds in ij p;u iw.kZr% eSfjV ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk;sxkA esfjV fyLV gsrq fuEu ekinaM fu/kkZjr fd;s x, gSaA

& dqy 100 vad

& 'kS{kf.kd vgZrk ¼3 o"khZ; fMIyksek ;k fMxzh ¼flfoy@eSdsfudy@bySfDVªdy bathfu;fjax½ esa dqy izkIrkad ds vk/kkj ij½ & 65 vad

& jktLFkku dk ewy fuoklh & 5 vad

& vuqHko ¼fdlh Hkh ljdkjh foHkkx@ljdkjh dEiuh esa dk;Z djus dk vuqHko] izR;sd o"kZ ds 10 vad½ & vf/kdre 30 vad**

2. A provisional list for selection was issued by the Department in which the name of the petitioner found place and the total marks obtained by him were mentioned to be 76.98. However, the petitioner was not finally selected, in which case