Surendra Kumar S/o. Shri Ramkumar vs State of Rajasthan, Through PP

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 256

SANDEEP MEHTA, BIRENDRA KUMAR
Surendra Kumar S/o. Shri Ramkumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G.R. Bhari.
For the Respondents: Arun Kumar, P.P. and K.V. Vyas.

ORDER :

1. The appellant-applicant herein has been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 13.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh in Sessions Case No. 4/2016 :

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 302/149 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs. 10,000/-	2 Months' S.I.
Section 307/149 IPC	7 Years' R.I.	Rs. 5,000/-	1 Month's S.I.
Section 341 IPC	1 Month's S.I.
Section 148 IPC	1 Year's S.I.	Rs. 1000/-	15 Days' SI
Section 323/149 IPC	6 Months' S.I.	Rs. 500/-	7 Days' S.I.

2. He has preferred D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 111/2021 for assailing the impugned judgment and in continuance thereof, the instant application for suspension of sentences has been moved under Section 389 CrPC.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor does not propose to file reply to the application for suspension of sentences and has chosen to argue the matter orally.

4. As per the allegations set out in the prosecution case and to be specific, in the statement of the star prosecution witness Sandeep @ Sethi (P.W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 256

SANDEEP MEHTA, BIRENDRA KUMARSurendra Kumar S/o. Shri Ramkumar – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, BIRENDRA KUMAR
Surendra Kumar S/o. Shri Ramkumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP – Respondent