JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, J.

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 29.3.2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No. 3, Bikaner (for short 'the trial court') in CRC No. 634/2019.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the petitioner and the private respondents have already settled their dispute amicably. It is submitted that during pendency of the trial, the petitioner has filed an application before the trial court with a prayer for quashing the criminal proceedings pending against the private respondents on the basis of compromise arrived at between them, whereby the trial court vide order dated 29.3.2019 has attested the compromise for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 323 IPC, but refused to attest the same for the offence punishable under Section 498-A IPC, as the same is non-compoundable.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that as the petitioner and the private respondents have already entered into compromise and on the basis of it, the private respondents have been acquitted for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 323 I.P.C., there is