SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 268

DINESH MEHTA
Pancharam, S/o. Tejiya (Since Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Nathuram S/o. Bhuraram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Teja Ram.

ORDER :

Dinesh Mehta, J.

1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 20.10.2021, passed by the learned members of the Board of Revenue in an appeal filed by the petitioners being appeal No. 3119/2021 of Jalore.

2. The facts narrated in brief are that the legal representatives of petitioner Pancharam instituted a suit for declaration that he be declared successor/owner of the land belonging to Bhura S/o Hamira situated in Khasra No. 57 of village Vatera, Tehsil Jaswantpura, District Jalore. The said suit was decreed by Additional Collector, Bhinmal (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Court') vide order dated 11.03.2010.

3. The respondents No. 1 to 4 preferred an appeal along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act claiming themselves to be the legal heirs of Bhura. The appeal filed by respondents No. 1 to 4 was allowed by the Revenue Appellate Authority vide order dated 30.06.2021 and the matter was remanded back to the trial Court with a direction to hear all the parties, including the appellants therein, who claimed themselves to be the legal heirs of Bhura.

4. Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 30.06.2021, passed by the Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top