SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 303

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JODHPUR
SANDEEP MEHTA, RAMESHWAR VYAS, JJ.
Madhuram S/o Sh. Javrilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 185 of 2018
Decided On : 11-01-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Vineet Jain, Ashok Panwar, Dhirendra, Rajiv Bishnoi.
For the Respondents: B.R. Bishnoi, J.S. Choudhary, Pradeep Choudhary.

Headnote:

Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Sections 313, 437-A and 161 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 147, 302/34, 304 Part-I, 148, 149, 307, 323 and 427 - Evidence Act - Section 27 - Appeal against conviction – Offence of murder – Examination of accused - Alleged that in morning, (PW-5) had been threatened premise that since he had given out their names in incident involving assault on a roadways' bus driver, they would take revenge by killing him - Complainant was sitting at his shop was sitting outside shop lathis and iron rods came there and launched an assault on (PW-5) with intention of killing him - Alleged that assailants had launched assault in order to wreak vengeance on account of an old land dispute and also on premise that they had been named in assault launched on roadways bus driver - Complainant got hurt on his head and leg on his head with iron rods, causing him serious injuries which resulted in profuse bleeding. also sustained injuries on his head, hands and other parts of body – Held, Two injuries of Malaram were found to be grievous and injuries of were found to be simple in nature after medical examination and thus, the accused Madhuram, Jetharam and Tarachand deserve to be convicted for the offences under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC - accused definitely had the common intention to commit offence conviction has to be recorded for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC - conviction of the appellants as recorded by the trial court for offence under Section 148 is also quashed - Accused-appellants are on bail On going through the record, it becomes clear that the accused Tarachand has remained in custody for nearly 11 months and 17 days during trial and during pendency of the instant appeal - Appeals are allowed/partly allowed.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 07.08.2018 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 3, Jodhpur Metro in Sessions Case No. 10/2013 (153/2011):

Offences

Sentences

Fine

Fine Default sentences

Section 148 IPC

2 Years' S.I.

Rs. 1,000/-

Month's S.I.

Section 323/149 IPC

6 Months' S.I.

Rs. 500/-

1 Month's S.I.

Section 325/149 IPC

3 Years' S.I.

Rs. 5,000/-

3 Months' SI

Section 302/149 IPC

Life Imprisonment

Rs. 20,000/-

6 Months' SI

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the appellants have preferred these two appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted herein-below:

    Sub-Inspector Deva Ram (PW-21) recorded the Parcha Bayan (Ex.P/2) of the complainant Malaram (PW-6) on 03.07.2011 at Mathura Das Mathur Hospital, Jodhpur wherein, the complainant alleged that in the morning, Rawalram (PW-5) had been threatened by Madhuram, Tarachand, Shrawanram, Sumer, Jetharam and Pannaram on the premise that since he had given out their names in the incident involving assault on a roadways' bus driver, they would take revenge by killing him. At around 5:00-5:30 p.m. the complainant was sitting at his shop and Rawalram was sitting outside the shop. At that time, Madhuram S/o Shri Javrilal, Sumer S/o Shri Javrilal, Pannaram S/o Shri Badriram, Tarachand S/o Shri Phusaram and Jetharam S/o Shri Hapuram, armed with swords, hockey, lathis and iron rods came there and launched an assault on Rawalram (PW-5) with the intention of killing him. Malaram (PW-6) intervened on which, he too was beaten up. He and Rawalram cried out for help, upon which, his elder brother Kishan and Virendra @ Bablu (PW-4) came around and made an attempt to rescue them. On seeing Kishan and Virendra @ Bablu, the assailants, turned their wrath towards these two persons and attacked them. They also scattered the goods lying in his shop. On hearing the commotion, Tulsiram (PW-10), Ramesh (PW-1), Manish (PW-3) and Arjun (PW-2) came there and intervened to rescue the complainant and his companions. He alleged that the assailants had launched the assault in order to wreak vengeance on account of an old land dispute and also on the premise that they (the appellants) had been named in the assault launched on the roadways bus driver. The assailants thrashed them and caused serious injuries with an intention of killing. The complainant got hurt on his head and leg. Madhuram and Jetharam had hit Kishan on his head with iron rods, causing him serious injuries which resulted in profuse bleeding. Rawalram also sustained injuries on his head, hands and other parts of body. Virendra @ Bablu (PW-4) had also suffered head and leg injuries in the incident. The assailants, had come with an intention to kill them and had also damaged his shop and the articles lying therein.

On the basis of this report, an FIR No. 246/2011 (Ex.P/32) came to be registered at the Police Station Basni, Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323 and 427 IPC and investigation was commenced. Kishan was taken to the M.D.M. Hospital, Jodhpur for treatment where he was declared dead. Autopsy was conducted on the dead body of Kishan. The injured persons were also examined and their injury reports were prepared. Some of the accused assailants had also received injuries in the incident and they too were provided treatment in the hospital. Since Kishan passed away, offence under Section 302 IPC was added to the case. The accused persons were arrested and as usual, acting on the information, allegedly provided under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, the Investigating officer proceeded to effect recoveries of the weapons and clothes

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top