SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1031

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Manoj Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Vigyan Shah, Deepak Gupta and Dheeraj Palia for R.P. Saini, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.

1. The issue raised in these writ petitions relating to answer key stands already decided by this Court in the case of Neha Salodia vs. State of Rajasthan & Others, SBCWP No. 15089/2020 decided on 7.1.2021, wherein this court held as under:-

    "The petitioner by way of this writ petition challenges the revised answer key which has been published after obtaining objections from the concerned participants, alleging that objections raised by the petitioner has not been considered properly and the answer of question No. 10 was wrongly left to be corrected and another question was also not deleted while revising the answer key. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the answer to question No. 10 ought to be deleted as none of the answers were correct. Learned counsel submits that all options in the question were incorrect and in support thereof, learned counsel has placed some certain excerpts of the third Edition of Jodhrajkrat Hameer Raso to submit that the name of Ranthambore as per Hameer Raso was not Ranastambhapur which has been treated as correct option by the respondents. Similarly another question answer options were wrong and it should

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top