SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1054

DINESH MEHTA
Gopal Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Suniel Purohit
For the Respondents: Mr. Ram Dayal

JUDGMENT :

DINESH MEHTA, J.

The present bunch of writ petitions involve a challenge to proceedings of revision initiated by the Tehsildar - Sirohi for setting aside registered pattas which have been issued in petitioners' favour.

2. As facts and questions to be determined are common and identical, all these petitions are being decided simultaneously; however, for the purpose of clarity, facts of SB Civil Writ Petition No. 9438/2018 (Gopal Patel v. State of Rajasthan) are being taken into reckoning.

3. The petitioner herein was conferred title over a land admeasuring 1250 sq. feet area of Khasra No. 1218 of Revenue Village, Sirohi (on the basis of his possession), by the Municipal Council, Sirohi. A registered patta dated 13.01.2015 in this regard came to be issued in his favour.

4. The respondent - Tehsildar tried to dispossess the petitioner in spite of the fact that he was having registered patta for which the petitioner filed a civil suit along with application for temporary injunction. Learned Civil Judge allowed application for temporary injunction vide its order dated 27.09.2016 and directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner, without adopting due process of law.

5. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top