SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1055

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Modi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Kishan Giri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Sandeep Saruparia.
For the Respondents: Mr. D.S. Nimla, Mr. Manish Pitaliya.

JUDGMENT :

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the above appeals are taken up and decided by this common order as the issue involved in these appeals is identical.

2. The present appeals have been preferred against the judgment and award dated 15.03.2010 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chittorgarh in Motor Accident Claim Case Nos. 188/2009, 187/2009, 183/2009, 184/2009, 185/2009 & 186/2009.

3. The above appeals have been filed by the owner of the vehicle on the ground that after adjudicating the claim petitions, learned Tribunal has fastened the liability on the owner of the offending vehicle to pay the compensation to the claimants.

4. Heard.

5. Briefly the facts necessary to be mentioned are that on 25.01.2006, driver of TATA 207 bearing registration No. RJ G 5792 drove the vehicle rashly and negligently resulting into the accident. The occupants who are claimants in this case suffered injuries and for the same, claim petitions were preferred before the Tribunal. Learned Tribunal after framing of the issues adjudicated the claim petitions and awarded compensation to the claimants in the present case on the basis of evidence adduced ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top