SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1107

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Sarita Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Siddharth Jain, R.D. Meena, Ram Pratap Saini, Dheeraj Palia, Naveen Dhuwan, Shashi Bala Sharma, Manoj Kumar Avasthi, Shiv Charan Gupta, Gajender Sharma, Mahendra Sharma, Sultan Singh Kuri, Neetu Bhansali, Madhumita Das, Sukhraj Singh Rathore, Satya Pal Poshwal, Sudhir Yadav, Hari Krishana Sharma, Kuldeep Aswal, Kuldeep Kumar Sharma, Mahipal Singh Kharra, Laxmi Kant Malpura, Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Rameshwar Prasad Sharma, Shobhit Vyas, Sudesh Kasana, Ravindra Kumar Tomar, Sameer Sharma, Vigyan Shah, N.K. Tiwari, Bhupendar Kumar Sharma, Subhash Sharma, Ashok Yadav, Manoj Ojla, Amit Kumar Gauttam, Rahul Lodha, Sanjay Buri, Karan Singh and Neelu Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondents:C.L. Saini, AAG, Jaivardhan Singh Shekhawat, Advocate on behalf of R.P. Singh, AAG and Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J.

1. The petitioners have preferred these writ petitions assailing the answer key published finally for the Rajasthan Eligibility Exam for Teachers (REET-2017).

2. It has been submitted that several questions in the question papers for REET 2017 had wrong answers published in the answer key or there were more than one options which were correct. It is submitted that on account of such discrepancy in the answer key, the petitioners have been deprived of receiving minimum 60% marks for REET-2017 and subsequent deprivation from participation/selection in appointment for the post of Teacher Grade-III.

3. In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21681/2018 : Sarita Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., a challenge has been made to the answers provided in the answer key for question Nos. 15, 33, 79, 90, 95, 132, 140 & 147 of "Booklet Series F".

4. Learned counsel has painstakingly taken this court to each and every question and the options mentioned therein and also to certain reference books to contend that the answers provided in the answer key were wrong and he submits that either the answers which the petitioners have answered should be treated as correct or in t

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
              whatsapp-icon Back to top