Deeparam Meghwal vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1132

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Deeparam Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Pradeep Shah, Advocate
For the Respondents: R.R. Chhaparwal, P.P.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. The appellant herein has been convicted and sentenced as below vide Judgment dated 30.07.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore in Sessions Case No. 46/2012 (C.I.S. No. 95/2014):

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Section 302 IPC	Life imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	5 Months’ R.I.
Section 364 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	5 Months’ R.I.
Section 392 IPC	7 Years’ R.I.	Rs.10,000/-	5 Months’ R.I.
Section 201 IPC	7 Years’ R.I.	Rs.10,000/-	5 Months’ R.I.
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of the impugned Judgment, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeal are noted herein below:

4. A written report (Ex. P/20) came to be lodged by Bhalaram (PW-5) at the Police Station Bhinmal, District Jalore on 26.07.2012 alleging inter alia that his brother Shankraram used to operate his Tavera vehicle bearing registration No. R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1132

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHADeeparam Meghwal – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Deeparam Meghwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent