PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Dhiraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J.
1. In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.
2. This misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner seeking direction to run all the sentences concurrently passed against the petitioner in seven cases by the learned trial courts mentioned in Schedule-A of the petition for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
3. Brief facts of the case as noticed by this Court are that seven complaints were filed in different courts on different dates in connection with dishonor of the cheques in question for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act. The petitioner was convicted for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act vide judgment dated 24.03.2018 in Case No. 48/13 (30483/14) passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 2, Jodhpur, judgment dated 30.05.2019 in Case No. 989/18 (8746/17) passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 8, Jodhpur, judgment dated 07.09.2018 in Case No. 130/14
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.