SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1159

ARUN BHANSALI
Assistant Engineer Rural Jodhpur Vidut Vitran Nigem Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kiran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :V.K. Bhadu, Advocate
For the Respondents:Ravi Panwar, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Arun Bhansali, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.10.2016 passed by District Judge, Pali, whereby, the suit filed by the respondents for compensation under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 ('the Act'), has been decreed and a compensation to the tune of Rs. 5,59,000/- has been awarded along with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the suit.

2. The suit was filed with the averments that deceased - Kishan Lal - son, father and husband of the plaintiffs, while working in his field, came in contact with the stay wire of the electric pole and suffered electrocution, which resulted in his death and for the said fatal accident, compensation to the tune of Rs. 42,01,000/- was claimed.

3. The suit was contested by the appellants by filing written statement denying any kind of negligence on part of the defendants.

4. The trial court framed four issues. On behalf of the plaintiffs - two witnesses were examined and seven documents were exhibited, on behalf of the respondents, one witness was examined and two documents were exhibited.

5. After hearing the parties the trial court came to the conclusion that from the FIR lodged and the post mortem report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top