SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1184

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Suhas Kamadi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
sAdvocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:S.S. Rajpurohit, P.P. and D.S. Udawat, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Manoj Kumar Garg, J.

1. By the instant criminal revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Women Atrocities Cases), Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 36/2013, whereby the learned trial court framed charges against the petitioner for the offences under Sections 494, 495, 420 & 376 IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that an FIR was registered against the petitioner upon filing of a complaint by respondent No. 2, which was sent by learned competent Court to Police u/s. 156(3) Cr.P.C. The gist of allegations levelled in the complaint was that accused No. 1 (the present petitioner) made contact with the complainant while she was working at Krishna Hospital, Bhilwara and accused gradually increased his contact. He started making physical relations with the complainant by promising to get higher position and higher salary. After some time, when the complainant did not get the high position and increased salary, she suspected the intention of the accused, however, on assurance of accused to marry her, the complainant believed the falsehood of the accused, who continu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top