SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1202

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
Madan Lal Bawri - Appellants
Vs.
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cri. Misc. Second Bail Application No. 4469 of 2021
Decided On : 21-05-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Suresh Kumbhat, Advocate
For the Respondents: Shrawan Bishnoi, P.P.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/34, 460, 307, 325 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 439 – Offence of murder – Attempt to murder – Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt – Allegation against petitioner of inflicting fatal injury on deceased is not based on any evidence – Held, It is submitted that above said witnesses have not shown presence of petitioner in their police statements, however, later on, they have falsely deposed before the court below that petitioner was also involved in commission of crime – It is further submitted that petitioner is in custody since long and trial of case will take time – Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application – Having regard to totality of facts and circumstances of case, without expressing any opinion on merits of case, Court deem it just and proper to grant bail to accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C – Cr.P.C. allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Bishnoi, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR/CR No. 40/2018 of Police Station Sojat Road, District Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 460, 307 and 325 IPC. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the allegation against the petitioner of inflicting fatal injury on the deceased is not based on any evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited my attention towards the police statements of two injured witnesses viz. Mitha Ram and Tija Devi, recorded soon after the incident, wherein they have not named the petitioner but have named his brother Mukesh as the aggressor, who inflicted fatal injury. It is submitted that the above said witnesses have not shown the presence of the petitioner in their police statements, however, later on, they have falsely deposed before the court below that the petitioner was also involved in the commission of crime. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case will take time.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Madan Lal S/o Shri Panna shall be released on bail in connection with FIR/CR No. 40/2018 of Police Station Sojat Road, District Pali provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top