SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1097

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Tulsa Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ibrahim – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Prashant Panwar on behalf of Rajesh Panwar
For the Respondents: Lalit Parihar, Sanjeev Johari and Shokat Ali

ORDER :

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.

1. The present appeals have been preferred by the appellants challenging the judgment and award dated 28/08/2001 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balotra in Motor Accident Claims Case Nos. 60/99, 62/99 and 96/99. The Insurance Company has also preferred civil cross-objection in the appeal preferred by Babulal (CMA No. 231/2002). The claim petitions were disposed of by a common judgment as they arose out of the same accident which occurred on 12/01/1999. Thus, the present appeals as well as cross-objection are also being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Brief facts of the case are that while Hadmana Ram, Vashudev and Babulal were travelling on motorcycle to Jasol, a tanker insured with the respondent/Insurance Company being driven rashly and negligently by its driver hit the motorcycle from the opposite direction. In the said accident, Vashudev and Hadmana Ram died and Babulal sustained several injuries. Thus, the claim petitions were preferred.

3. Learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence and hearing the learned cou

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top