Yogesh S/o. Shri Amar Lal vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1228

SANDEEP MEHTA, MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Yogesh S/o. Shri Amar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : J.V.S. Deora.
For the Respondents: Farzand Ali, GA-cum-AAG and B.R. Bishnoi, AGC.

ORDER :

1. The instant application for suspension of sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by appellant-applicant Yogesh S/o Amar Lal, who has been convicted and sentenced vide judgment dated 12.01.2018 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Salumber, Distt. Udaipur in Sessions Case No. 60/2013 (CIS No. 192/20214), as below:-

Offence Under Section	Imprisonment	Fine	Sentence in default of fine
302/34 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	1 year's SI
201/34 IPC	7 years' R.I.	Rs.1000/-	6 month's S.I.
120-B IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.10,000/-	1 year's SI

(All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.)

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has filed reply to the application for suspension of sentences and proposes to argue the matter orally.

3. We have heard and considered the submissions advanced by J.V.S. Deora and Shri Farzand Ali, AAG and have gone through the impugned judgment and the record.

4. After going through the impugned judgment of the trial court, it is clear that entire case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1228

SANDEEP MEHTA, MANOJ KUMAR GARGYogesh S/o. Shri Amar Lal – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Yogesh S/o. Shri Amar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent