IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
DINESH MEHTA, J.
Suo Motu - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2877 of 2021
Decided On : 11-06-2021
Criminal Procedural Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 2 (viia) and (xxiiia), 18 , 18(c) , 37(1)(b) - Punishment for contravention in relation to coca plant and coca leaves - Punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis – It has been brought to the Court's notice that the notification No. 1055(E) dated 19th October, 2001 issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (viia) and (xxiiia) of section 2 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 does not specify small or commercial quantity for cultivation of Papaver somniferum commonly known as opium poppy or poppy plants - Held, Court deems it expedient to call upon the Central Government to explain the rationale behind insertion of "Note. 3" in the notification dated 19.10.2001, instead of prescribing small and commercial quantity - The Court would examine expediency, legality or proprietary of the 3rd note in the notification. The court may further issue appropriate direction(s) to the Central Government (if deemed necessary) to prescribe small quantity and commercial quantity in terms of number of plants or area cultivated so as to bring the notification in consonance and harmony with the provisions and scheme of the Act – Ordered accordingly.
ORDER :
Dinesh Mehta, J.
1. The present petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been registered pursuant to order dated 11.6.2021, passed by this Court in SB Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 4986/2021.
2. While dealing with the said bail application and other like matters, it has been brought to the Court's notice that the notification No. 1055(E) dated 19th October, 2001 issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (viia) and (xxiiia) of section 2 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act of 1985) does not specify small or commercial quantity for cultivation of Papaver somniferum commonly known as opium poppy or poppy plants.
3. Note No. 3 given at the bottom of the notification gives out following reason for not specifying the quantity:
4. In the opinion of this Court since the very cultivation of opium poppy without a license is prohibited under section 18 of the Act of 1985, the view of the Central Government that cultivation of opium poppy irrespective of its quantity is covered by section 18(c) of the Act of 1985, apparently runs contrary to statutory position.
5. In the face of above stipulation in the notification, each case of cultivation of poppy plants irrespective of number (1 plant or 1 lac plants) is being considered punishable under the provisions of section 18(c) of the Act of 1985 and offenders are being released on bail without ensuring observance of the provisions contained in section 37(1)(b) of the Act of 1985.
6. The reason for forming the above opinion is based on comparative reading of sections 16, 18 and 20 of the Act of 1985, which provisions deal with the offence and punishment with respect to cultivation of coca Plant, coca leaves, opium plant or poppy plant and cannabis plant respectively.
7. It will not be out of place to reproduce provisions contained in sections 16, 18 and 20 of the Act of 1985 so as to have a comprehensive look and better understanding of the scheme of the Act of 1985:
18. Punishment for contravention in relation to opium poppy and opium. -Whoever, in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made or condition of licence granted thereunder, cultivates the opium poppy or produces, manufactures, possesses, sells, purchases, transports, imports inter-State, exports inter State or uses opium shall be punishable,
(a) where the contravention involves small quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to [one year], or with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, or with both;
(b) where the contravention involves commercial quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees which may extend to two lakh rupees:
Provided that the court may, for reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a fine exceeding two lakh rupees;
(c) in any other case, with rigorous imprisonment which may extend to ten years and with fine which may extend to one lakh rupees.]
20. Punishment for contravention in relation to cannabis plant and cannabis.-Whoever, in contravention of any provisions of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.