SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1256

SANDEEP MEHTA
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Himmat Jagga and Aruna Negi
For the Respondent: S.K. Bhati, PP and Dron Kaushik

ORDER :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the accused-petitioners for assailing the order dated 05.12.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, Women Atrocities & Dowry Cases, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Revision Petition No. 35/2019 whereby, the revision petition preferred by the petitioners was rejected and the order dated 02.02.2019 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sri Ganganagar in Criminal Regular Case No. 214/2018 (State Vs. Arun Kumar & Ors.) directing the framing of charges against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 498A and 406 of the IPC was upheld.

2. In nutshell, facts relevant and essential for disposal of the Misc. Petition are noted hereinbelow :-

The respondent No. 2 complainant Smt. Pratibha Dhingra filed a complaint against the petitioners and one Lakshit Kumar at the Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri Ganganagar on 21.12.2017 alleging inter alia that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner No. 1 Arun Kumar at the Classic Castle Resort, Firozpur (Punjab) on 17.02.2014 as per the Hindu rites and rituals. Wholesome dowry was given at the time of her marriage. All her dowry articles

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top