SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1265

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Dai Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ramson – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : R.S. Mankad
For the Respondent: Vinod Bhadu

ORDER :

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.

1. The case is listed in the "orders category", however, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard and decided finally.

2. At the request of the learned counsel for the appellants, service upon respondents No. 1 is dispensed with at his own risk and cost.

3. The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants-appellants against the judgment and award dated 30.07.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dungarpur in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 125/2015, whereby the learned Tribunal after framing of the issues, evaluating the evidence and hearing learned counsel for the parties awarded a sum of Rs. 8,76,176/- in favour of the claimants on account of death of one Arvind in an accident which occurred on 27.10.2014.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the factors taken into consideration by the learned Tribunal for computation of the award does not require any interference. However, he submits that no amount towards loss of future prospects has been awarded to the claimants-appellants in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top