SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1243

ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Karan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Agarwal – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ashok Kumar Pareek, Anil Sharma and Shalendra Joshi, Advocates

ORDER :

Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.

1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant-defendant challenging the order dated 31.07.2021, whereby the application filed by the appellant under Order 14 Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC for amending and striking out issues has been partly allowed.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-Mr. Ashok Kumar Pareek submitted that respondent No. 1-Raghunath Agarwal has filed an election petition against the present appellant in respect of municipal elections for Ward No. 134, Municipal Corporation (Greater), Jaipur.

3. Learned counsel submitted that the respondent No. 1, in the prayer of his election petition, has specifically asked only for setting aside the election dated 01.11.2020 and declaration of result dated 03.11.2020. Learned counsel submitted that the prayer clause also included relief of cancellation of election and further direction to conduct the election afresh.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in the election petition, filed by the respondent No. 1, a reference was made in para Nos. 7 and 8 that the nomination form of respondent No. 1 was wrongly rejected and he was illegally deprived to contest the election.

5. Learned c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top