JUDGMENT :

1. The matter comes up on an application (1/2022) filed by the applicant-Shri Govind Pandit S/o Shri Shyam Lal Pandit claiming himself to be a Ward Member of the Nagar Parisad, Beawar seeking his impleadment as respondent.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on his complaint, the order impugned placing the petitioner under suspension has been passed and hence, he may be impleaded as respondent.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the writ petition involves a lis in between the petitioner and the official respondents, the applicant is neither necessary nor, proper party. He, therefore, prayed for dismissal of the application.

4. Heard. Considered.

5. Indisputably, the writ petition involves a lis in between the petitioner, an elected Member and Chairperson of Nagar Parisad, Beawar and the official respondents in as much as challenge is made to the legality and validity of the order dated 17.06.2022 placing him under suspension. Merely because the applicant is a Ward Member and has made complaint(s) against the petitioner, he can neither be reckoned as necessary nor, proper party.

6. A co-ordinate Bench of this Court has, in the c