SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 346

SUDESH BANSAL
Gajraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Govind Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Alok Garg
For the Respondent: Mr. Rahul Sharma

JUDGMENT/ORDER :

1. All three second appeals arise out of the Civil Suit for prohibitory and mandatory injunction filed by plaintiff-Govind Singh, being power of attorney holder of Smt. Krishna Kumari against the defendant-Gajaraj Singh and in that suit defendant- Gajraj Singh has filed counter claim seeking prohibitory injunction against plaintiff.

2. The dispute between the parties, is in relation to the gully of 8 feet width, situated between the houses of both parties. Both parties are neighbors.

3. The trial court, although recorded fact finding that the gully of 8 feet wide, exists between the houses of both parties yet dismissed the plaintiff's suit for prohibitory and mandatory injunction and simultaneously dismissed the counter claim of the defendant vide judgment and decree dated 21.01.2006.

4. Plaintiff, feeling aggrieved by the dismissal of his suit for prohibitory and mandatory injunction, challenged the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2006 by filing Civil First Appeal registered as C.F.A No.11/2006. The defendant challenged the judgment and decree dated 21.01.2006 to the extent of dismissing his counter claim and defendant's first appeal was registered as C.F.A. 19/2006.

5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top