SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 355

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SANDEEP MEHTA, KULDEEP MATHUR, JJ.
Ghevar Ram – Appellant
Versus r
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10128 of 2022
Decided on : 21-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner Mr. V.D. Gaur, Advocate.

The main legal point established is the availability of a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the mechanism established by the Division Bench Judgment, involving the submission of representation to the District Collector and the functioning of the PLPC.

Headnote:

Encroachment - Public Interest Litigation - Jagpal Singh & Others V. State of Punjab & Others, (2011) 11 SCC 396 - The court directed the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector, who shall assign the matter to the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) constituted under the directions of the court. The PLPC shall conduct a thorough enquiry into the representation and decide the same within six months. If any adverse order is passed, the petitioner can challenge it as per law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a writ petition (PIL) seeking removal of alleged encroachments made over specific lands, citing violations of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner has a suitable remedy for ventilating grievances through the Division Bench Judgment directing the submission of representation to the District Collector and the functioning of the Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC).

Issues: The issues involved the alleged encroachments over specific lands and the inaction of the respondents in not removing the encroachments.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the petitioner to follow the mechanism established by the Division Bench Judgment, which involved submitting a representation to the District Collector and the functioning of the PLPC for conducting an enquiry and making a decision within six months.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioner to submit a representation to the District Collector, who shall assign the matter to the PLPC for conducting an enquiry and making a decision within six months. The petitioner was given the liberty to challenge any adverse order passed.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has approached this Court by way of this writ petition (PIL) with the following prayers:-

    "i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents, encroachment made over the land in question bearing Khasra No.584/1058 Gair Mumkin School field and Khasra No. 1439/422 of Village Panchodi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur de hors the clear provisions of law and the aforesaid principles of law drawn by the Hon'ble Apex Court may kindly be declared illegal, arbitrary, unjustified and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

ii) By an appropriate writ, order, or direction, the impugned inaction on the part of the respondents in not removing the alleged encroachment so made over the land Khasra No.584/1058 Gair Mumkin School field and Khasra No.1439/422 of Village Panchodi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur deserves to be declared illegal, unjust and contrary to the provisions of law and is violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent State of Rajasthan and the District Collector, Nagaur to remove the alleged encroachments made over the land/dispossess the land Khasra No.584/1058 Gair Mumkin School field and Khasra No. 1439/422 of Village Panchodi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur and by dispossessing them restore the original position of the said land.

iv) By an appropriate wit, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be restrained from issuing any pattas with regard to the land falling in Khasra No.584/1058 Gair Mumkin School field and Khasra No. 1439/422 of Village Panchodi, Tehsil Khinvsar, District Nagaur."

2. Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by counsel representing the petitioner and, having gone through the material available on record, we are of the firm view that the petitioner has available to him a suitable remedy for ventilating his grievances by virtue of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019 wherein this Court directed as below:-

    "This Court is inundated with large number of writ petitions, styled as public interest litigation, from almost all the Districts of the State, with allegations of encroachment over the pasture land/land of 'johad', 'talab'/river/river bed/public way/Shamshan/Kabristan etc. In all such petitions, common allegation is that despite repeated complaints/representations to the concerned revenue officers, no steps are taken by them to remove the encroachment. This results in number of writ petitions being filed by the complainants/representationists before this Court.

This Court has been passing orders in such matters requiring the respective District Collectors to examine the factual content of the allegations and take steps to remove the encroachments so as to secure such land.

In order therefore to provide a pan-Rajasthan solution to this ever persisting problem, we deem it appropriate to direct the Chief Secretary of the State to devise a permanent mechanism, which should be operational in every District of the State where the concerned District Collector should be required to periodically notify for the information of the general public to lodge the complaints/representations with regard to such encroachments with a specially designated Public Land Protection Cell (for short 'PLPC') for rural areas. The PLPC should be headed by District Collector and function under his direction and supervision. The PLPC shall get such complaints/representations enquired into by deputing concerned Sub DivisionalOfficer/Tehsildar/Naib Tehsildar so as to verify whether or not such encroachments have actually taken place on such land. If the allegations are found to be substantiated, appropriate steps in accordance with law be immediately taken for removal of the encroachments and appropria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top