Hansraj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These Criminal Misc. Petitions have been preferred claiming the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 (Annex.1) may kindly be quashed and set aside and the order dated 26.05.2016 (Annex.2) passed by the learned trial Court may kindly be upheld and the petitioner may kindly be discharged.”
In S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1679/2017:-
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 (Annex.1) may kindly be quashed and set aside and the order dated 26.05.2016 (Annex.2) passed by the learned trial Court may kindly be upheld and the petitioner may kindly be discharged.”
2. The genesis of both the petitions lies in a common controversy, as the petitions have been preferred against the impugned order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Nohar, whereby while quashing and setting aside the order dated 26.05.2016 passed by the learned trial court, of discharging the petitioners for the offences under Section 7/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.