SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 467

Pappu @ Bhika Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Shreekant Verma.
For the Respondent: Mr. S.K. Bhati, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

1. By way of the present appeal filed under section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”), the appellants have challenged the judgment dated 18.07.1990 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Sriganganagar (hereinafter referred to as “the Trial Court”) in Sessions Case No.47/89, whereby all the appellants were convicted and sentenced as under :

Appellant

Conviction

Sentence

Pappu

307, 149 IPC

Three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2000. In default of payment of fine six months rigorous imprisonment

 

148

One-year simple imprisonment

447

One-month rigorous imprisonment

323

Six months simple imprisonment and a fine of rupees hundred. In default of payment of fine simple imprisonment of 15 days

Jugli Ram

307, 149 IPC

Three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2000. In default of payment of fine six months rigorous imprisonment

 

148

One-year simple imprisonment

447 IPC

One-month rigorous imprisonment

323, 149 IPC

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
          whatsapp-icon Back to top