SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 539

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
State – Appellant
Versus
Megh Nath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. M.S. Bhati PP
For the Respondents: Mr. S.K. Verma

JUDGMENT :

1. In the wake of instant surge in COVID – 19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in the Court, for the safety of all concerned.

2. In the present criminal appeal preferred by the appellant-State, a challenge is laid to the judgment dated 30.03.1993 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratangarh in Sessions Case No.21/92 (12/89), whereby the accused-respondent was acquitted from the charges levelled against him for the offences under Sections 376, 357 & 114 IPC.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the appellant-State submits that a verbal report was lodged by complainant-Smt. Aasi (also referred to as ‘prosecutrix’) before the Police Station, Dungargarh, to the effect that two years prior to lodging of the said report, upon the death of her father-in-law, her husband borrowed a sum of Rs.500/-from the accused respondent Meghnath; in lieu of such loan, the complainant alongwith her husband worked in the field of the accused-respondent, so as to enable them to repay the said amount, which they successfully repaid accordingly.

3.1 Learned Public Prosecutor furt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top