SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 21

SANDEEP MEHTA, KULDEEP MATHUR
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan Singh S/o Shri Ganpat Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sunil Mehta
For the Respondent: Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC

JUDGMENT :

MEHTA, J.

1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 02.04.1992 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagaur in Sessions Case No.2/1990, whereby the learned trial court acquitted the accused-respondents from the charges under Section 302 and in the alternative 302/34 IPC and instead convicted them for the offence under Section 323 and 325 IPC and sentenced them as below :

Offence for which convicted

Sentence awarded

Section 323 IPC

Six months’ rigorous imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo one month’s simple imprisonment

Section 325 IPC

Two years’ rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.1,000/-and in default of payment of fine, further to undergo two months’ simple imprisonment

2. The State of Rajasthan has preferred D.B. Criminal Appeal No.294/1992 for assailing the acquittal of the accused from the charges under Section 302 and 302/34 IPC, whereas the accused have filed the appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC for assailing their conviction and sent

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top