JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.26/2019 of Police Station Raisingh Nagar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 21 and 29 NDPS act. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the prosecution story, huge quantity of tablets and capsules containing narcotic substance have been recovered at the instance of co-accused Bharat Bhushan. It is further submitted that the allegation of the prosecution is to the effect that co-accused Bharat Bhushan, in his confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS act, has stated that he procured the said narcotic substance from Sanjay Kumar and petitioner-Manish Kumar. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that on the basis of the said confessional statements, the petitioner was arrested by the police. It is further argued that now it is well settled that the confessional statements recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS act are not admissible i