SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 256

VIJAY BISHNOI
Sonu @ Praveen S/o Shri Maniram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Gita.
For the Respondent: Mukesh Trivedi.

JUDGMENT :

VIJAY BISHNOI, J.

1. Heard and perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioners has/have been arrested in FIR No. 170/2020 of Police Station Rawla, District Sri Ganganagar for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 341, 324, 326 and 325 IPC. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these second bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. The first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 15.1.2021 as not pressed while giving him liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of the statement of injured Jitendra Kumar and other prosecution witnesses namely Sitaram, Krishnalal and Ravi.

4. It is noticed that charges were framed against the petitioner on 9.3.2021 and thereafter regularly the so-called prosecution witnesses have been summoned by the trial court from time to time. Despite issuance of bailable warrants against injured Jitendra Kumar and other prosecution witnesses namely Sitaram, Ravi and Krishnalal and despite clear instructions given to counsel for the complainant, the above-named witnesses did not appear before the trial court for recording their evidence, however, ultimately statement

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top