JUDGMENT :

SUDESH BANSAL, J.

1. The civil suit for permanent injunction and for demolition of construction allege to be made on the joint portion of Chawk, Pol and open land, bearing Civil Suit No. 135/1969 titled as Shri Narain vs. Radha Mohan Lal was dismissed by the Civil Judge (Jr. Division) East Jaipur City (hereinafter referred to “the Trial Court”) vide judgment and decree dated 26.08.1976 but on filing the first appeal by the plaintiff-Shri Narain, the First Appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree dated 26.08.1976 passed by the Trial Court and decreed the civil suit in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant vide judgment and decree dated 16.04.1983 (19.04.1983), hence feeling aggrieved by the decree for demolition of construction, the original defendant-Radha Mohan Lal has preferred the present civil second appeal under Section 100 CPC. The operative portion of the impugned judgment and decree dated 16.04.1983 (19.04.1983) passed by the First Appellate Court in Civil First Appeal No. 4/1977 is being extracted hereunder:

^^vkns'k

Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV dk Øksl&vkWCtsD'ku [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA vihykUV dh vihy eatwj dh tkrh gS o oknh dk nkok fMØh fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV okni= ds pj.k la[;k&2 esa of.kZr fuekZ.k cjkenk o thuk 17 QqV 10^^ xq.kk 8**&9** o mlds Åij nwljs [k.M esa cjkenk o thuk gVkys o thuk tks 9 QqV & 6^^ xq.kk 1^^&5** tehu nckyh gS mls [kkyh j[ksA ;g uD'ks ,Xt+&1 esa ¼d½] ¼[k½] ¼x½ ls crk;s x;s gSA Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV if'pe eq[kh dejs ds vkxs dk pcwrjk 8^^ & 6^^ xq.kk 27** tks ,Dt+&1 esa ¼?k½ ls crk;k x;k] gVkysA Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV dks ;g Hkh vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd og uD'ks ,Xt+&1 esa i] Q] c] Hk esa rkehj gS mldks Hkh gVk fy;k tkosA Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS o fu"ks|kKk }kjk ikcan fd;k tkrk gS fd mDr rkehjkr gVkus ds ckn lfEefyr Hkwfe tks okni= ds pj.k la[;k 2¼x½ esa of.kZr gS rFkk gosyh ds ihNs okyh lfEefyr Hkwfe o pkSd] iksy esa Hkfo"; esa fdlh Ádkj dksbZ fuekZ.k dk;Z ugha djs u djkos o oknh dks lfEefyr miHkksx ls oafpr ugha djsA Áfroknh rkehjkr 4 eghus esa gVkysA [kpkZ nkok o vihy vihykUV Áfroknh jsLiksUMsUV ls ikosxkA uD'kk ,Xt+&1 tqt ipkZ fMØh jgsxkA**

2. Necessary and relevant facts, as culled out from the record, are that:

2.1 Original respondent-plaintiff Shri Narain happens to be nephew of original appellant-defendant Shri Radha Mohan Lal and he instituted the present civil suit way back on 10.03.1969 stating inter-alia that in the double story Haveli north facing situated near Kabristan Agra Road, Jaipur, separate house of both parties are constructed but Chawk, Pol and open land in front of pole and land of back portion of the Haveli are joint property of parties.

2.2 Plaintiff pleaded in the plaint, inter-alia that the defendant has raised construction of covered pakka porch, stairs and chabutara etc. without his consent on the joint property of Chawk, Pol, and open land of front side of Haveli. Such disputed construction was shown by cross lines in red colour in the map appended with the plaint (Ex.1) and description of same was mentioned in Para 2 ¼d] [k ,oa x½ of the plaint. It is worthy to take note that basically the plaintiff sought demolition of disputed construction alleging it to be made by the defendant on the joint portion of Chauk and open land, in order to maintain, restore and protect the joint use and possession of such common portion and incidentally, also prayed for the decree of permanent injunction not to deprive the plaintiff in future from use and occupation of joint property. It would be apposite to reproduce the relief prayed for by the plaintiff in the plaint at verbatim hereunder:

^^¼d½ okn Áfroknh ds fo:} O;; U;k;ky; lfgr fMØh fd;k tkdj fuekZ.k dk;Z of.kZr pj.k&2 Áfroknh ds O;; ds rqM+ok;s tkosa o oknh dks lfEefyr dCt+k fnyok;k tkosA

¼[k½ Áfroknh dks LFkk;h fu"ks|kKk }kjk ck/; fd;k tk;s fd oks okni= ds pj.k 2¼x½ esa of.kZr lfEefyr Hkwfe rFkk gosyh ds ihNs okyh lfEefyr Hkwfe o pkSd iksy esa Hkfo"; esa fdlh Ádkj dk dksb