SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2741

DINESH MEHTA
Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ram Singh Rawal, Advocate, Shrawan Kumar Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - This application for bail has been filed by the applicant under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.179/2022, Police Station Savina, Udaipur for the offence under section 379 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the offence alleged against the applicant is that of theft of motorcycle and the charge-sheet has been filed and in spite of the fact that the case is triable by the Magistrate, the applicant is behind bars since 25.05.2022.

3. Inviting Court’s attention towards the charge-sheet, learned counsel for the applicant argued that the recovery of the motorcycle has not been made from the applicant-accused and it was found lying in abandoned condition. He argued that the applicant has been enroped only on the basis of confessional statement and on the basis of such confessional statement, which was got under police custody, the applicant cannot be convicted.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand vehemently opposed the bail application and argued that there are as many as 23 cases of like nature registered against the applicant and thus, bail be not granted to him.

5. Looking to the number of cases of like nature tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top